Archive - Feb 21, 2008

Date

Build Condos Instead of Wall on Border

When I am in Austin I like to read John Klesko's column on the American-Statesman in the Metro/State section. He is like our version of Ken Hoffman (Houston Chronicle) yet much older but just as funny. This Sunday, he wrote a piece about his reflections on immigration. I loved the satire he used. If you are from Austin or have been here in the last few months you may have noticed all the new condos springing up near the downtown/78704 area. Well, Klesko has noticed and he gives his two cents.

Klesko claims, "I've come up with a more attractive way to keep the Mexicans out of
Texas. Instead of putting up an ugly wall, why not build a solid wall of really tall, expensive condominiums right next to one another all along the Texas-Mexico border?"

You may wonder why, right? Well he states that, "building beau coup condominiums would provide work for the potential immigrants. Instead of sneaking across the border and continuing on to, say, the day labor corner on Interstate 35 in North Austin, they'd stop at the border for condo construction jobs and stop driving some Americans crazy."

Just in case you thought he was a crazy right wing minuteman gun toting American he delivers the punchline. "As tense as the immigration situation is now, I can hardly get any sleep at night from worrying about Mexican immigrants sneaking into my neighborhood and trimming my hedges. Or mowing my lawn at a reasonable price."

Nonetheless, I am glad that some peope are getting tired of the fear that certain politicians attempt to engrain on people about immigration. Folks . . . there is no invasion from the South. About 1 million people immigrate "illegally" to the U.S. every year. 50% of those folks come here legally but overstay their work/student visa so they then become illegal immigrants. The other half come through the South. Quite an invasion huh? It's like we never saw it coming. If you wish to read the entire commentary then click here and you will be redirected the Austin American-Statesman.


Do or Die for Clinton

clinton.jpg

It's "Do or Die" for Clinton now. The way that Obama has consistently beat her in the last 10 elections but in particular in the proportion she has been suffering the losses (at times 75-25%) has taken its toll. I predict that if Obama is able to pull off Texas then she will end up losing the nomination come convention time. I will also go on a limb and claim that if Obama upsets her with a 6 to 3 voter difference then her camp will call it quits shortly after.

It isn't that Clinton is not qualified. She is, perhaps better qualified then Obama but she is not the change the majority of people voting in the primaries want. Clinton represents change but it is Obama that has been able to capitalize on it.

One would hope that her camp can persuade her to concede if she were to have no hope. The Democratic for the first time in a few years had two attractive candidates that has made it hard for the people to unite behind one. As the primaries continue though, it seems Obama is the one that is getting the nod from the people.

What does this mean for Clinton? It means that if it comes close and she continues to battle it and win, she may undermine her support come November. She may stir up the Evangelical Conservative Bloc to show up in numbers to counter her. This predicament is not unlikely and it is unfortunate I believe that she would lose due to this scenario.

What does this mean for Democrats but in particular Obama? It means that he will be winner if it comes to a tie. Party members know that if Clinton does not beat him then anything that gets her foot in the door due to a tie will be looked at suspiciously. The media has already speculated that "men in smoked filled rooms" will be deciding the candidate come convention time. This folks is not an option for those that will feel the party has sabotaged the nomination. They may retaliate by not voting for that person, in this case Clinton.

Thus, it is quite clear. All Obama has to do in Texas is win either by a large or a small percentage or lose by a small percentage to get the nod. On the other hand Clinton has to pull one of the greatest upsets in Primary history. This can be done . . . but it is quite unlikely.